Saturday, 26 July 2014

ঈদ মঙ্গলবার না কি বুধবার ? আসুন, বিভ্রান্তি ও বিশৃংখলা এড়াতে, দায়িত্বশীলতার সঙ্গে মুসলিম ভাইদের নিকট ইসলামের নির্দেশ পৌছিয়ে দিই

লেখক : মাওলানা মুহাম্মদ এ কে আজাদ (আবু আরিফ আল আলাভী ) 




                 প্রায় প্রতিবার ঈদের দিনক্ষন নিয়ে দেখা দেয় কলহ, বিভ্রান্তি ও বিশৃংখলা। খুশির ঈদ পরিণত হয় বিবাদের বস্তুতে। এই বিশৃংখলা প্রকৃতপক্ষে ইসলাম ও ইবাদত-উপাসনা  সম্পর্কে ইসলামের গাইডলাইন সম্বন্ধে আমাদের অজ্ঞতার ফল। দিন কাটে, মাস কাটে, বছর কাটে- কিন্তু ইসলামের যে শিক্ষাটুকু অর্জন করা ফরজে আইন বা অপরিহার্য, তার ধারে-কাছে ও ঘেঁষার চেষ্টা করি না।


          হাদীসের নির্দেশ : আবু হুরায়রা রা: বলেন, আল্লাহর নবী সাল্লাল্লাহু আলাইহি ওয়া সাল্লাম  বলেছেন-তোমরা (চাঁদ) দেখে রোযা রাখ ও (চাঁদ) দেখে রোযা ভাঙ্গো (অর্থাৎ ঈদ করো ) ” ( বুখারী শরীফ-২/৬৭৪) । মহা নবী সাল্লাল্লাহু আলাইহি ওয়া সাল্লাম  আর ও বলেছেন- তোমরা (চাঁদ) দেখে রোযা রাখ ও (চাঁদ) দেখে রোযা ভাঙ্গো (অর্থাৎ ঈদ করো ) , আর যদি তোমাদের উপর আকাশ মেঘাচ্ছন্ন থাকে তবে তোমরা ৩০ দিন পূর্ণ কর( মুসনাদে আহমাদ-১৬ /৯১)।   এই হাদীসদ্বয় অনুসারে, ঈদের জন্য চাঁদ দেখা শর্ত, কোন কারনে ২৯শে রমজানের পর চাঁদ দেখা না দিলে, ৩০ দিন পূর্ণ করে নিতে হবে।  পাশাপাশি কোন জায়গায় চাঁদ দেখা দিলে শরীয়ত-সম্মত ভাবে সাক্ষ্য সংগ্রহ ও তা ঘোষনা করার ব্যবস্থা করতে হবে।


      হাদীসের উল্টোপথে আমরা : এবার ও কিছু ভাই প্রায় দশ দিন আগে থেকে হাদীসের পরিপন্থী কথা বলতে শুরু করেছেন যে এবার ঈদ মঙ্গলবার বা ২৯শে জুলাই (২৯টি রোজার পরেই )  অনুষ্ঠিত হয়ে যাবে। যদি জিজ্ঞাসা করা হয়, “কেন, কোন হাদীসের ভিত্তিতে তুমি এই কথা বলছ”?, তাঁরা নীরব থাকে। কিন্ত ভিত্তিহীন গুঞ্জন আর গুজব চলতেই থাকে ! রোজার মত অতি-গুরুত্ব্বপূর্ন একটি এবাদতকে নিয়ে চলে ছেলেখেলা ! হাঁ, এমন কথা বলা যেতে পারে যে, চাঁদ দেখা দিলে ইন শা আল্লাহ মঙ্গলবার ঈদ হয়ে যাবে, না হলে বুধবার। কিন্তু সরাসরি ঘোষনা করা যে ঈদ মঙ্গলবারেই হবে, এরুপ বলা হাদিসকে অস্বীকার করার নামান্তর।  মুলত: তিন ধরণের লোক এরুপ প্রচার চালায় :

          [১]  কিছু সাদাসিধে সরল মানুষ । এরা অন্যের দ্বারা প্রাভাবিত হয়ে এবং আবেগ তাড়িত হয়ে একাজ করেন। এদেরকে সঠিক বিষয়টি বুঝিয়ে দিলেই অবশ্য তাঁরা  বুঝে যান।

        [২] কিছু জেনারাল শিক্ষিত অহংকারী মানুষ। টিভিতে কিছু লেকচার শুনে এবং বাংলায় দু-একটি চটি ধর্মীয় বই পড়ে তাঁরা নিজেদেরকে গবেষক, হাদীস-বিশেষজ্ঞ ও সর্বাপেক্ষা বড় ইসলাম-সংস্কারক বিবেচনা করেন। সমীক্ষা চালালে দেখা যাবে যে এদের এক হাজার জনের মধ্যে ৯৯৯ জনই কালিমা তাইয়িবা  শুদ্ধ করে পড়তে পারেন না। এমনকি ফরজ গোসলের ফরজ কয়টি যদি জিজ্ঞেস করা হয় তাহলে এরা চোখে অন্ধকার দেখবেন। অথচ আলেম শ্রেনীকে এরা অবজ্ঞার দৃস্টিতে দেখেন এবং সর্বদা বিশ্ব-বরেন্য উলেমায়ে কেরাম এবং ঈমামদের ত্রুটি আলোচনা করেন। আউলিয়ায়ে কেরাম সম্পর্কে এদের অবজ্ঞা তো সীমাহীন ও অসহনীয়।

           [৩] সউদি আরবের অনুসারী ফির্কা-পরস্ত কিছু  খারিজী মৌলবী। এরা কথায় কথায় লোকের কাছ থেকে তারা হাদীস দেখতে চান কিন্তু তাদের নিকট থেকে হাদীস এখতে চাওয়া হলে তারা মুখকে বাংলা পাঁচের মত করে নেন। এদের কাজই হোল কেবল মুসলামানদের মধ্য ঝগড়া বিবাদ লাগানো। তাঁরা মুসলমানদেরকে বোঝানোর চেষ্টা করেন যে সউদি আরবের এক দিন পরে ঈদ করতে হয়। কিছু  খারিজী মৌলবী এমন ও প্রচার করেন যে সউদি আরবের সঙ্গে সঙ্গেই ঈদ করতে হয়। এবার রমজান শুরুর আগে এক খারিজী মৌলবীর সঙ্গে আমার নিম্নরুপ আলোচনা হচ্ছিল:
   আমি: কি শাইখ, রোজা কখন ধরছ ?
   খারিজী মৌলবী : হেঁ হেঁ, সউদি আরবের এক দিন পরেই তো রোজা শুরু হয়।
   আমি: ভাই, এটা আবার কোন হাদীসে আছে যে সউদি আরবের এক দিন পরে রোজা শুরু করতে হয়?

খারিজী মৌলবী : হেঁ হেঁ, হাদীসে নেই তবে আমরা এভাবেই ধরি
আমি:  একথা কোন অজ্ঞ বলতে পারে । কিন্তু তুমি তো আলেম, তুমি কিভাবে এই কথা বলছ ?
খারিজী মৌলবী : হেঁ হেঁ, ঐ আর কি .........
আমি:  রোজা শুরু করার সঙ্গে চাঁদের সম্পর্ক না সউদি আরবের সম্পর্ক ? হাদীস কি বলে?
খারিজী মৌলবী : হেঁ হেঁ, হাদীস অনুসারে, রোজা শুরু করার সঙ্গে চাঁদের সম্পর্ক।
আমি:  তাহলে যারা সউদি আরবকে অনুসরণ করে তারা ঠিক করছে না ভূল করছে ?
খারিজী মৌলবী : হেঁ হেঁ, ভুলই করছে ।
আমি:  বাংলাদেশের রাজশাহীর কিছু মানুষ আবার ঐদিনই ঈদ করে যেদিন সউদি আরব করে । তারা ঠিক করছে না ভূল করছে ?
খারিজী মৌলবী : হেঁ হেঁ, ভুলই করছে ।
আমি:  তা এদেরকে বোঝাচ্ছ না কেন ? নিজেদেরকে দাবী কর ‘হাদীস-ওয়ালা’ বলে অথচ সবক্ষেত্রে হাদীস-বিরোধি কাজ কেন কর? 

[খারিজী মৌলবী নীরব থেকে গেল]।

আমাদের দায়িত্ব : শরীয়তের নির্দেশকে যথাযথ ভাবে মুসলমানদের নিকট পৌছিয়ে দেওয়া আমাদের ন্যুনতম কর্তব্য। 



Tuesday, 8 July 2014

Post-Mortem Of Zakir Naik’s Mushriki Aqidah That He Is Allah's Son !!!

AUTHOR : MAULANA MUHAMMAD A K AZAD [ ABU ARIF AL ALAWI]











                  In a reply to a Christian's question about Jesus Christ's being Son of Allah, Brother Zakir Naik says  that one who obeys Allah is His son, not by birth but by obedience. Naik calls himself, too,  Allah's son as he obeys Him. Thus all who obey Allah are, according to Naik, His sons. Dr Zakir says :

                           " Adam, Israel,Isaac have been referred as Allah's 
                             son in Bible but son is not referred to as begotten 
                              son...... in Bible it is written whoever obeys Allah's 
                             words is Allah's son, If you obey Allah's word, according
                                to Bible,  you are also Allah's son. If I obey Allah's 
                             word, I am also Allah's son, but in the Biblical way,
                            not in the begotten way"  
                         Link is : www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnHjMCSbFxU


             Dear Readers !  Can you imagine?  He always demands proof of Al Quran and Sahih Hadith . But he himself provides Only logic, logic and logic ! Only strange logic he provides in support of his own beliefs. He provides No Verse of Al Quran and no  Hadith!

          A Pro-Zakir Naik Institution, Central Mosque.com tried  to defend zakir Naik on this issue saying : "There is no problem with is statement. It is obvious that Zakir Naik does not mean that they are biological sons of Allah Ta'ala, especially since himself says it. This is similar to how an authentic Hadith calls those who learn the Quran and practice upon it the family of Allah Ta'ala. (Ibn Majah, 1/78) Another Hadith states that all people are the family if Allah. (Al-Mujam al-Kabir, 10/86) "Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:29 AM . When I asked them ,"can one call himself Allah's brother? Can a woman call herself Allah's wife? Can one call Allah Subhanahu Taala his /her father? Can one call himself Allah's nephew ? What is Islam's ruling?" (Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:19 PM ), they maintained dead silence.  If this standpoint is accepted, one may call allah Subhanahu Taala his brother because , as per Islam, each and every Mu'min is brother of one another and Allah's one name is Mumin, therefore  would Zakiris call Him borther also ? Astagfirullah.


              Even I approached Brother Naik himself and his IRF on this issue. When in response of my 16 questions to Zakir Naik, IRF briefed me that they "do not entertain queries on matters pertaining to Fiqh and Masaail, since our speciality is propagating Islam to non-Muslims i.e. matters pertaining to Islam and Comparative religion", I asked them :" In every issue against Ahle Sunnat Wa zamaat, you demand evidences from Quran and Sahih Hadith but you yourself present all your cases only with the help of logic and reason.' If' is your main weapon and with the word-game you try to befool the audiences who is in the darkness of Islamic theology. In a reply to a Christian's question you say, one who obeys Allah is His son, not by birth but by obedience. Naik calls himself Allah's son as he obeys Him. What is it? How can you dare to utter such dangerouswords? Which verse of Al quran or which Hadith can you preesnt as
evidence in support of your strange views? This is not the only case . In countless cases, you have uttered poisonous views, harmful for you own as well as the listners' Imaan." (Sent on Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 9:43 PM
).  But Zakir Naik and his IRF maintained dead silence.



              Brothers & Sisters!  Dr. Naik’s belief that he is the son of Allah is  actually belief of  the Jews and  The Christians. This belief is absolutely against Islam.The Jews and The Christians too used to call themselves “ Allah’s sons” and Allah refuted them harshly.  Almighty Allah says in Holy Quran Surah Al Maidah, Verse No. 18 says:


18. وَ قَالَتِ الْیَهُوْدُ وَ النَّصٰرٰى نَحْنُ اَبْنٰٓؤُا اللّٰهِ وَ اَحِبَّآؤُهٗ١ؕ قُلْ فَلِمَ یُعَذِّبُكُمْ بِذُنُوْبِكُمْ١ؕ بَلْ اَنْتُمْ بَشَرٌ مِّمَّنْ خَلَقَ١ؕ یَغْفِرُ لِمَنْ یَّشَآءُ وَ یُعَذِّبُ مَنْ یَّشَآءُ١ؕ وَ لِلّٰهِ مُلْكُ السَّمٰوٰتِ وَ الْاَرْضِ وَ مَا بَیْنَهُمَا١٘ وَ اِلَیْهِ الْمَصِیْرُ۝۱۸


18. And the Jews and Christians said We are sons of Allah and His dear ones'. Say you; 'why then does He torment you for your sins'? But you are human beings of His creations. He forgives whom He pleases. And to Allah belongs the Kingdom of heavens and earth and all that is between them. And towards Him is the return.

18. اور یہودی اور نصرانی بولے کہ ہم اللہ کے بیٹے اور اس کے پیارے ہیں۶۲) تم فرما دو پھر تمہیں کیوں تمہارے گناہوں پر عذاب فرماتا ہے۶۳) بلکہ تم آدمی ہو اس کی مخلوقات سے جسے چاہے بخشتا ہے اور جسے چاہے سزا دیتا ہے اور اللہ ہی کے لئے ہے سلطنت آسمانوں اور زمین اور اُن کے درمیان کی اور اُسی کی طرف پھرنا ہے

[Holy Quran Surah Al Maidah, Verse No. 18]



        Dear Readers !  We urge Brother Zakir not to comment on sensitive issues, specially about Allah Subhanahu Taala. Loose talk on such issues may lead to the destruction of Imaan. We are slaves of  Allah. we are Gulam of Allah. We are worshippers of Allah. Allah is our Absolute Malik. How can we engaze in such nasty talks ?  May Allah guide us along Siratwal Mustaqeem.












































































Dr Zakir Naik’s Blunder Of Claiming Himself To Be A Hindu

AUTHOR : MAULANA MUHAMMAD A K AZAD [ ABU ARIF AL ALAWI]











                Dr.  Zakir Naik says: " ......what is the meaning of the word Hindu…….the word Hindu is a geographical definition…..itmeans those people who live in the land of Indus valley civilization….those who live in India…I live in India. by definition I am a Hindu…..swami Vivekananda said Hindu is a geographical definition…swamin vivekanda says it's a misnoma…..the correct word should be vedantist….because Hindus follow the Vedas….vedantist should be the right word….Hindu is a misnoma….but if you say Hindu is a person who
does idol worship then am not a Hindu…"(Symposium- religion in the right perspective------"Presenting Islaam and Clarifying Misconceptions –Lecture series by Dr. Zaakir Naik,Developed by AHYA Multi-Media- 12 Enlightening Sessions



            Respected Brothers & Sisters!    It  is fard on Muslims to maintain the distinction from kuffar and Mushrikin. Mr Naik's geographical definition  of Hindu is partly true.  In the remote past, one might have indicated the people of Indus Valley as Hindu.. But Today, Hindu is rigorously religious identity, not geographical identity. His quoted authority Swami Vivekananda himself in countless places referred Hinduism as  a religion. Vivekananda says: " The Hindu can worship any sage and any Saint from any country whatsoever....." Swamiji clearly distinguishes the Hindu Religion from the  muslims in this words: "When the Mohammedans first came, we are said-I think, on the authority of Ferishta............to have been six hundred milliond of Hindus. And then every man going out of the Hindu pale is not only a man less, but an enemy the more." ( Teachings of Swami Vivekananda, published by Advaita Ashrama, Page 113).  Zains live in India. If geographical definition of Hindu is accepted, Zains too should be called Hindus. But The Supreme Court of India In the 2006 verdict, found that the "Jain Religion is indisputably not a part of the Hindu Religion( para 25, Committee of Management Kanya Junior High School Bal Vidya Mandir, Etah, Uttar Pradesh v. Sachiv, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad, U.P. and Ors., Per Dalveer Bhandari J., Civil Appeal No. 9595 of 2003, decided On: 21.08.2006, Supreme Court of India). In 1995, while considering the question "who are Hindus and what are the broad features of Hindu religion", The Supreme Court of India highlightes Bal Gangadhar Tilak's formulation of Hinduism's defining features:


"Acceptance of the Vedas with reverence; recognition of the fact that the means or ways to salvation are diverse; and the realization of the truth that the number of gods to be worshipped is large, that indeed is the distinguishing feature of Hindu religion."( Supreme Court of India, "Bramchari Sidheswar Shai and others Versus State of West Bengal", 1995)


    Secondly,   Persian dictionary titled Lughet-e-Kishwari, published in Lucknow in 1964, gives the meaning of Hindu as ‘chore (thief), dakoo (dacoit), raahzan (waylayer), and ghulam (slave). If Zakir Naik insists on being called Hindu by definition, one may take him to be a chore  or thief and I am sure Brother Naik would not love to be called chore or thief.


       Thirdly, modern research dismisses the theory of Hindu being the corrupt version of Sindhu. Dr Baldev Singh writes: "The interpretation that the word Hindu is a corrupted version of Sindhu does not explain why the Sindhu River or the people who live in the valley of this river did not acquire the name “Hindu.” This river is called Sindh and the people are called Punjabis and Sindhis. No body calls the state of Sindh as Hind or Sindhis as Hindis.........this word Hindu is a  corrupt form of Sindhu but this is wrong because Sindhu was the name of the river and not the name of the community." Dr Singh further wrires:

" The word Hindu may be as old as the Indus Vallay Civilization. To
find the meaning of “Hindu” one ought to look at the term “Hindu
Kush”(killer of Hindus). Who were the people, who named this
mountain range as Hindu Kush? Why these mountains were called the
killers of Hindus? As I mentioned earlier, the Indian subcontinent
was inhabited by dark complexioned people before the migration of
Caucasian tribes from the Caucasus region. The fair skinned
Caucasian tribes who lived on the Northwest of Hindu Kush Moutain
range called the Indian subcontinent as the land of Hindus (land of
black people). The Northwest expansion of the inhabitants of Indus
Valley was prevented by of Hindu Kush Mountains. Whenever the plain
dwelling Indians (Hindus) attempted to cross these mountains, they
met death due harsh terrain and heavy snow. That is how these
mountains were given the name Hindu Kush by mountain dwelling
Caucasian tribes. Once a large number of Indian people died on these
mountains due to heavy snow fall and that is how these mountains
acquired the name “Hindu Kush” – killer of the Hindus. [Bhai Kahan
Singh Nabha, Mahan Kosh, 1996 edn. p 275.]
Source : tritiopokhkho.wordpress.com/.../a-note-on-history-meaning-of-wor



          Most Importantly, Brother Zakir has made a distressing blunder by saying that he is a Hindu by geographical definition. Islam is a deen, the complete code of life. A Muslim cannot be a Hindu, Christian or Jew simultaneously whatever may be the meaning of these words. Rasulullah Sallallahu Alaihi Wa sallam warned :"Whoever says that he is on Deen other than Islam then he is as he says." (Bukhari, good manners and form, vol 8, hadith 073). Even Zakir Naik's own Salafi mentors rebuke him thus: "And you degrade yourself to the position of those losers claiming that you are a Jew and you are a Christian, it is authentically proved by Ibn Umar
رضى الله عنه that Rasoolullah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم said: "Whosoever imitates with any nation then (indeed) the one is from amongst them."  [REF: Saiykh Yaheeya Al Hazoorie under question no 25 & 26.]


.                         Wa Maa Alaina Illal Balagh




.








































































Will women will get male hoor in paradise ? Post-Mortem Of Dr. Zakir Naik’s Blasphemous Aqidah

Author : Maulana Muhammad A K Azad [ Abu Arif Al Alawi]














     Pseudo-Reformer Zakir Naik’s  horrible blunder is that he makes his own tafsir of Al Quran like his mentor Abul Ala Maududi. This is open declaration of war against Sharia Rules. Maududi writes in favour of making own tafsir of Quran : ''The teachings of Qur'an and Sunnat-e-Rasool are a must for all but not from the old collection of Tafseer and Ahadith.''  (Tanqihaat, Page 114). Now let us see how Maududi's flag-bearer Mr Naik dares to cross all limitations.


     Dr Naik was asked :  " Assalamu Alaikum My name is Saba. I am a student.  My  question to brother Zakir is that according to the Qur’an when a man enters paradise, he will get hoor, i.e. beautiful maidens. What will a woman have when she enters paradise? "

        Brother Naik replied :    " The word hoor occurs in the Qur’an in no less than four different places: In Surah Dukhan chapter 44, verse 54 , In Surah Al-Tur chapter 52 verse 20 , In Surah Rahman chapter 55 verse 72 , In Surah Al-Waqiah chapter 56 verse 22 . Many translators of the Qur’an have translated the word hoor as ‘beautiful maidens’ especially in the Urdu translations. If hoor means ‘beautiful maidens’ or girls, then they are meant only for the men. Hence, what will the women get if they enter Paradise? The word hoor is actually the plural of ahwar (applicable to man) and of haura (applicable to woman) and signifies a person having eyes characterized by hauar a special quality bestowed upon a good soul, male or female in paradise and it denotes the intense whiteness of the white part of the spiritual eye. The Qur’an describes in several other verses , Surah baqara-Verse No 25 and Surah Nisah - Verse No 57 that in paradise you will have azwaje mutahhara meaning companion .Mohammad Asad has translated the word hoor as spouse and Abdullah Yusuf Ali as companion. Therefore, the real meaning of hoor is companion or partner. A man in paradise will have a hoor that is a beautiful maiden with beautiful big and lustrous eyes and a woman in paradise will get a man with beautiful big and lustrous eyes. Hope the answer is clear."

     {REF :    Translated from Bengali version of Womens Rights in Islam by Dr Zakir Naik. Bengali Translation: Sk Golam Mainuddin. Page 17 under question No 5}



      Dear Readers ! To mainatin the Hyaaa of women as well as men , I'll not delve deep into this issue. Just let us Ponder over a basic Point. InshaAllah, it'll be  sufficient to expose  Zakir Naik's word-game .

      Did Rasulullah Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam ever say in tafsir of the verses relating to hoors that  women will get male hoor in paradise ? Did Khulfae Rashidin ever say in tafsir of concerned verses that  women will get male hoor in paradise ? Did any Tabi'i  and Tab-Tabain, belonging to the age of Khairul Quroon, ever say in tafsir of concerned verses that women will get male hoor in paradise ? Did Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam shafi'i, Imam Maliki and Imam Hanbal ever make such tafsir? Did any Tafsir-Specialist, from Tabari, Ibne Kathir, Fakhruddin Razi, Qurtubi  and  Jalaluddin Syuoti to  Justice Karam Shah Azhari  make such tafsir ? Did any  Scholar in the 1400-years history  of Islam ever declare in tafsi of the concerned verse that women will get male hoor? The answer is, emphatic No. Even Ibne Taimiya and his followers did not dare to make such tafsir. De facto, there is not the tiniest hint  in Al Quran and Hadith regarding women receiving male hoor in Paradise.





       Dear Readers !  Please read these verses of al Quran  relating hoors attentively.
    

        1.     In these [gardens] will be mates of modest gaze, whom neither man nor invisible being will have touched ere then. [55:56]

         2.     [There the blest will live with their ]companions pure and modest, in pavilions [splendid] [55:72]

      3.        [companions] whom neither man nor invisible being will have touched ere then. [55:74].



      .
       Dear Readers !What Does  Brother Zakir Naik mean ? Does he mean that that there are gay men in Jannah?  That's what it means when you declare` the "hoor" mentioned in the Qur'an refers to men when these verses clearly states that no man or jinn has touched them.

                                         Tafseer of Ibn Katheer on these verses

"(Qasirat At-Tarf) chaste females, wives restraining their glances, desiring none except their husbands, seeing them as the most beautiful men in Paradise. This was said by Ibn `Abbas, Qatadah, `Ata' Al-Khurasani and Ibn Zayd. It was reported that one of these wives will say to her husband, "By Allah! I neither see anything in Paradise more handsome than you nor more beloved to me than you. So praise be to Allah Who made you for me and made me for you.'' Allah said,
[لَمْ يَطْمِثْهُنَّ إِنسٌ قَبْلَهُمْ وَلاَ جَآنٌّ ]

(whom never deflowered a human before nor Jinn ) meaning they are delightful virgins of comparable age who never had sexual intercourse with anyone, whether from mankind or Jinns, before their husbands. This is also a proof that the believers among the Jinns will enter Paradise. Artat bin Al-Mundhir said, "Damrah bin Habib was asked if the Jinns will enter Paradise and he said, `Yes, and they will get married. The Jinns will have Jinn women and the humans will have female humans.''' Allah's statement,
[لَمْ يَطْمِثْهُنَّ إِنسٌ قَبْلَهُمْ وَلاَ جَآنٌّ فَبِأَىِّ ءَالاءِ رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ]

(whom never deflowered a human before nor Jinn. Then which of the blessings of your Lord will you both deny) Then Allah describes these women for the proposed:
[كَأَنَّهُنَّ الْيَاقُوتُ وَالْمَرْجَانُ ]

(they are like Yaqut and Marjan.) Mujahid, Al-Hasan, Ibn Zayd and others said, "They are as pure as rubies and white as Marjan.'' So here they described Marjan as pearls. Imam Muslim recorded that Muhammad bin Sirin said, "Some people either boasted or just wondered who are more in Paradise, men or women. Abu Hurayrah said, `Has not Abu Al-Qasim (Muhammad ) said,
«إِنَّ أَوَّلَ زُمْرَةٍ تَدْخُلُ الْجَنَّةَ عَلَى صُورَةِ الْقَمَرِ لَيْلَةَ الْبَدْرِ، وَالَّتِي تَلِيهَا عَلَى (أَضْوَءِ) كَوْكَبٍ دُرِّيَ فِي السَّمَاءِ، لِكُلِّ امْرِىءٍ مِنْهُمْ زَوْجَتَانِ اثْنَتَانِ، يُرَى مُخُّ سُوقِهِمَا مِنْ وَرَاءِ اللَّحْمِ،وَمَا فِي الْجَنَّةِ أَعْزَب»

(Verily, the first group that will enter Paradise will look like the moon when it is full, and the next batch will be as radiant as the radiant star in the sky. Each one of them will marry two wives. The marrow of the bones of their shins will be seen through the flesh. None will be unmarried in Paradise.) This Hadith was recorded in the Two Sahihs. Imam Ahmad recorded that Anas said that the Messenger of Allah said,
«لَغَدْوَةٌ فِي سَبِيلِ اللهِ أَوْ رَوْحَةٌ خَيْرٌ مِنَ الدُّنْيَا وَمَا فِيهَا، وَلَقَابُ قَوسِ أَحَدِكُمْ، أَوْ مَوْضِعُ قِدِّهِ يَعْنِي سَوْطَهُ مِنَ الْجَنَّةِ خَيْرٌ مِنَ الدُّنْيَا وَمَا فِيهَا، وَلَوِ اطَّلَعَتِ امْرَأَةٌ مِنْ نِسَاءِ أَهْلِ الْجَنَّةِ إِلَى الْأَرْضِ لَمَلَأَتْ مَا بَيْنَهُمَا رِيحًا، وَلَطَابَ مَا بَيْنَهُمَا، وَلَنَصِيفُهَا عَلَى رَأْسِهَا خَيْرٌ مِنَ الدُّنْيَا وَمَا فِيهَا»

(A morning or an evening journey in Allah's cause is better than the world and whatever is on its surface. And a place in Paradise as small as that occupied by the whip of one of you, is better than the world and whatever is on its surface. If one of the women of the people of Paradise looks directly at the earth, she will fill what is between Paradise and earth with a good scent and all of it will become delightful. Verily, the veil over her head is better than this life and all that is on its surface.)     Al-Bukhari also collected a similar narration. "

                   It was narrated that Anas ibn Maalik (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: “I heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: ‘Going out and coming back for the sake of Allaah is better than this world and all that is in it. And a spot the size of the bow of one of you in Paradise – or a spot the size of his whip – is better than this world and all that is in it. If a woman from among the people of Paradise were to look at the people of this earth, she would light up all that is in between them and fill it with fragrance. The veil on her head is better than this world and all that is in it.’” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, no. 2587



                     FATWA OF SALAFI SCHOLAR Shaikh Ibn 'Uthaimeen 

 Allah, the Most Blessed, the Most High says, regarding the blessings of Paradise:

" ..Therein you shall have (all) that your inner-selves desire, and therein you shall have (all) for which you ask for. An entertainment from
(Allâh), the Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful." (Surah Fussilat 41:31-32)

And He, the Most High says:

"..And therein all that inner-selves could desire, and all that eyes could delight in and you will abide therein forever." (Surah Az-Zukhruf 43:71)

And it is well known that marriage is one of the things which the souls desire most, and so it will be found in Paradise for the people of Paradise, whether they be men or women. So, Allah, the Most Blessed, the Most High will marry the woman in Paradise to the man who was her husband in the life of this world, as He, the Most Blessed, the Most High says:

"Our Lord! And make them enter the 'Adn (Eden) Paradise (everlasting Gardens) which you have promised them - and to the righteous among their fathers, their wives, and their offspring! Verily, You are the All Mighty, the All-Wise." (Surah Ghafir 40:8)

If she did not marry in the life of this world, then Allah, the Most High will marry her to one who pleases her in Paradise.

[1] Al-Hur Al-'Ain: Beautiful maidens of Paradise

Taken from
Fatawa Arkan-ul-Islam
Islamic Verdicts on the Pillars of Islam
Pages 178 - 179,
By the Honorable Shaikh Muhammad bin Salih Al-'Uthaimeen





           View of Sheikh 'Atiyyah Saqr, former Head of Al-Azhar Fatwa Committee


In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.

All thanks and praise are due to Allah and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger.

Dear questioner, we would like to thank you for your good question and we implore Almighty Allah for His help in furnishing you with the best answer.

In the very beginning, we would like to cite Ibn Kathir's comment on the issue of men having Hoor Al-'Een. It reads: "Almighty Allah tells us that He will provide the residents of Paradise with beautiful wives who have big and lustrous eyes and 'whom no man or Jinn before them has touched' and who are 'Like unto rubies and coral'".

In fact, Paradise is the abode of the believers in the Hereafter. Allah has prepared for His believing servants, males and females, in Paradise indescribable bliss that which no eye has seen, no ear has heard of and that has never ever crossed the minds of people, to the extent that even the person who has the least blessings in Paradise will think that he is the most blessed one.

In more than one Qur'anic verse, Allah, Most High, calls upon His servants to do their utmost in order to be favored with Paradise. For example, He says, "And vie one with another for forgiveness from your Lord, and for a Paradise as wide as are the heavens and the earth, prepared for those who ward off (evil)." (Al 'Imran: 133)

All this indicates that in Paradise believing men and women will be showered with blessings; there is no room for discrimination based on gender in Paradise.

Focusing more on this issue, Sheikh 'Atiyyah Saqr, former Head of Al-Azhar Fatwa Committee, adds:

"Here Allah mentions the Hoor Al'Een because in most cases men pursue women and not vice versa. As for women, Allah Almighty may marry them to any of the believers in Paradise, if they did not get married during worldly life, or He may compensate them by making them feel content with their position. It is also said that Allah may grant women some kind of beauty with which they will feel that they are better than the Hoor Al-'Een and that they are their mistress, so they will not love anyone other than their own husbands nor will they feel jealous of the Hoor Al-'Een."


  


             In order to pacify the feminists, Brother Naik here dared to cross all limitations on this issue and tried to corrupt the aqida of general educeted Muslim youths.


                         Wa Maa Alaina Illal Balagh













































































Monday, 7 July 2014

Dr Zakir Naik’s Venomous Aqidah That Allah Cannot Do Thousand ( 1000) Things Is a Direct Challenge To The Sovereignty Of Almighty Allah

Author : Maulana Muhammad A K Azad [ Abu Arif Al Alawi]









           Dr. Zakir Naik, The Leader of The Kharizi Bidatis,  says :  "Regarding the second part of the question…that God can do  everything?…Normally I pose this question to most of the people who believe in God just so that they have better understanding of Allah subhanwatala …I ask them the question.. that can God create anything and everything …most of them will say Yes,… can God destroy anything and everything…all will say Yes …my third question is ..can God create
a thing which he cannot destroy… and they are trapped…if they say yes
.. that God can create a thing which he cannot destroy they are going
against the second statement that God can destroy everything ..if they
say no God cannot create a thing which he cannot destroy that means
they are going against first statement that God can create everything…
again they are not using logic… they are trapped …same way God cannot
create a tall short man  ..yes he can make a tall man short but no
longer he remains tall….he can make a tall man short……no longer
remains tall..he make a short man tall ..no longer that man remains
short….but you cant have a tall short man ..you cannot ….(word
unclear)…who is ..neither tall neither short ..but God can't make a
man who is tall and short at the same time similarly God almighty
..Allah subhantala cannot make a fat thin man …there are a thousand
things I can list which God almighty can't do
….God cannot tell a lie…
the moment he tells a lie.. he ceases to be God …God cannot be
unjust…the moment he is unjust he ceases to be God…God cannot be cruel
..God cannot forget …..you can list a thousand things ..God almighty
cannot throw me out of his domain….the full world the full universe
belong to him…he can kill me, he can obliterate me, he can make me
vanish ..but he cannot throw me out of his domain …to him belongs
everything ..where will he throw me…he can kill me ,…the can
obliterate me..he can make me vanish…but he cant throw me out of his
domain …nowhere does the quraan say God can do everything ..infact
quraan says…innAllaha ala kulli shai in Qadeer… that verily Allah has
Power over all things..quraan doesn't say God can do everything…quraan
says God has power over all things…several places….surah baqrah
chapter no.2 verse no.106 surah baqrah chap 2 verse 108.. surah imran
…aali imran chapter no. 3 verse 29 in surah nahl chapter no.16 verse
no. 77 in surah faatir chapter 35 verse no.1 …several places the
quraan says the quraan says innaAllaha ala kulli shaiin Qadeer..verily
Allah has power over all things…and there is a world of a difference
between Allah can do everything and Allah has power over everything
infact Quraan says in Surah Buruj chapter no.85 verse no. 15, and 16
it says that Allah is the doer of all He intends….see whatever He
intends He can do…but God only does Godly things ..he does not do
unGodly things……. ( Is Quraan Word of God, from the CD-"Presenting
Islaam and Clarifying Misconceptions –Lecture series by Dr.Zaakir
Naik, Developed by AHYA Multi-Media- 12 Enlightening Sessions)




        Respected Brothers & Sisters !   This is open challenge to the sovereignty of Almighty Allah. Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! Brother Zakir demands proof of Quran and sahih hadith in every step from Ahle Sunnat Wa Zamaat. But he  himself in lieu of producing evidence from Quran and Sahih Hadith, plays with words and sophisticated logics. Has he furnished any evidence from Quran and Sahih Hadith in support of his peculiar tawhid? Muslims! Is it tawhid?  Doesn't Allah say in Quran not to say of things of Allah that you don't know? Allah Almighty says :  "Say (O Muhammad [sal-Allâhu 'alayhi wa sallam]): "(But) the things that my Lord has indeed forbidden are Al-Fawâhish (great evil sins and every kind of unlawful sexual intercourse) whether committed openly or secretly, sins (of all kinds), unrighteous oppression, joining partners (in worship) with Allâh for which He has given no authority, and saying things about Allâh of which you have no knowledge." (Al-A'araaf: 33).   By these words Zakir Naik has disrespected  Allah  subhanahu Taala and restricted His  peerless and unimaginable power  by the Aqal of human beings.  Allah says:  "No knowledge have they of such a thing, nor had their fathers. Mighty is the word that comes out of their mouths. They utter nothing but a lie." (Al-Kahf: 5)



       Brothers & Sisters !    Zakir Naik's arrogance is matchless in the 1400-years old Islamic history. Throwing challenge to the sovereignty of the Creator? Dear Reader! Please think! Has our  beloved Sayedina Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi Wa Sallam ever explained  the tawhid of Allah in this way? Did respected Sahabae Keram and Ahle Bait ever dare to utter such insulting words about Allah Subhanahu Taala? Has any Hadith-Specialist, Tafsir-Specialist and Imams ever made such derogatory words about Allah Subhanahu Taala? Did Imam Gazzali , the Sultan  of logic, ever dared to use such poisonous words about my Creator? Shaykh Mainuddin Chisti converted about 90 lakh Hindus to Islaam.Did he ever utter such polluted words? Great Missionary Shaykh  Abdul Aleem Siddiquie, the Khalifa of  Ala Hazrat Imam Ahmed  Reza , converted  countless Non-Muslims to Islaam throughout the west Indies . Has this great Missionary ever made such venomous words? No, not at all.  Dr.Zakir shows that he has not obtained the knowledge of the Sunnah of the Rasulullah Salllallahu Alahi Wa sallam and his companions and the Aqeedah of Ahlus Sunnah wa Zamaat. We seek refuge to Allah from utering these Kufri words. To save ourselves from such infectious aqidah one should always try to remember the following verses:



 Quranic Verse No 1.  :  “Knowest thou not that it is Allah unto Whom belongeth the sovereignty of the heavens and earth; and ye have not, beside Allah, any friend or helper?” [2: AL–Baqarah: 107]
Quranic Verse No 2  :  “. Say: O Allah! Owner of Sovereignty! Thou givest sovereignty unto whom Thou wilt, and Thou withdrawest sovereignty from whom Thou wilt. Thou exaltest whom Thou wilt and Thou abasest whom Thou wilt. In Thy hand is the good. Lo! Thou art to do all things.” [3: Al–Imran: 26]
  Quranic Verse No 3  :  “ Knowest thou not that unto Allah belongeth the Sovereignty of the heavens and the earth? He punisheth whom He will, and forgiveth whom He will: Allah is Able to do all thigns.” [5: AL–Ma’idah: 40]
     Quranic Verse No 4  :  “Lo! Allah! Unto Him belongeth the sovereignty of the heavens and the earth. He quickeneth and He giveth death. And ye have instead of Allah no protecting friend nor helper.” [9: At–Taubah: 116]
    Quranic Verse No 5  :  “ And let not their speech grieve thee (O Muhammad). Lo! power belongeth wholly to Allah. He is the Hearer, the Knower.” [10: Yunus: 66]
    Quranic Verse No 6  :  “ Now Allah be exalted, the true King! There is no God save Him, the Lord of the Throne of Grace.” [23: Al–Mu’minun: 116]
      Quranic Verse No 7  :  “He unto Whom belongeth the sovereignty of the heavens and the earth, He hath chosen no son nor hath He any partner in the sovereignty. He hath created everything and hath meted out for it a measure” [25: Al–Furqan: 2]
      Quranic Verse No 8 :  “And He is Allah; there is no God save Him. His is all praise in the former and the latter (state), and His is the command, and unto Him ye will be brought back.” [28: Al–Qasas: 70]
    Quranic Verse No 9  :  “Whoso desireth power (should know that) all power belongeth to Allah” [35: Al–Fatir: 10]
     Quranic Verse No 10.  :  “ Unto Allah belongeth the sovereignty of the heavens and the earth. He createth what He will. He bestoweth female (off-spring) upon whom He will, and bestoweth male (offspring) upon whom He will” –[42: Ash–Shura: 49]


                 Wa Maa Alaina Illal Balagh